<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Good Reasons Why PLR Articles Are A Bad Idea</title>
	<link>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/</link>
	<description>Free Your Mind From The Tyranny Of Online Marketing Idiocy</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Harib</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-7064</link>
		<author>Harib</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 09:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-7064</guid>
		<description>NOTE: Even if PLR articles can be used in a variety of ways including newsletters, autoresponder series, special reports, ebooks etc. The only way to make sure that they are read by large number of people is by being the first few people to publish them, or else the topic will be crowded and will lose its value over time.

Harib S.H.  
http://www.thehottestebooks.com/downloads/articles 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOTE: Even if PLR articles can be used in a variety of ways including newsletters, autoresponder series, special reports, ebooks etc. The only way to make sure that they are read by large number of people is by being the first few people to publish them, or else the topic will be crowded and will lose its value over time.</p>
<p>Harib S.H.<br />
<a href="http://www.thehottestebooks.com/downloads/articles" rel="nofollow">http://www.thehottestebooks.com/downloads/articles</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annerose</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-6751</link>
		<author>Annerose</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-6751</guid>
		<description>I thank you for your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thank you for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photo Soren (Breiting)</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-4228</link>
		<author>Photo Soren (Breiting)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-4228</guid>
		<description>Hi everybody,
This is about an important but also diffecult issue, and thanks for raising the issue, Priya.
My experience is that we get better results in Google and with real visitors by writing 10 keyword focussed articles for our own website than to add 100 PLR articles, unless these have been completely rewritten. 
And if so this work might have taken quite a long time. On the other hand we know that some marketers have been very successful by using PLR articles in their own version for their websites. 
My problem with PLR articles are that they are very boring and often without a clue of anything new. 
Some of the circulating PLR articles from the well known 'gurus' in marketing are really bad, e.g. writing about the darkroom under keywords of digital photography. My feeling is that I have wasted quite a lot of money in buying PLR articels from different suppliers. I admit that some are much better and decent than others.
On the other hand I have to mention the ground breaking approach to successful online presense developed by Ken Evoy. His impressive ebook is now availabe free of charge at http://contact.sitesell.com/myss/ (unbelievable) and there is absolutely no catch. His approach will never ever be dumped by Google, I am sure, as his approach is the real way to develop a long-term business on a shoestring. I go back to this big e-book again and again.
- Have success
Photo Soren (from Denmark)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everybody,<br />
This is about an important but also diffecult issue, and thanks for raising the issue, Priya.<br />
My experience is that we get better results in Google and with real visitors by writing 10 keyword focussed articles for our own website than to add 100 PLR articles, unless these have been completely rewritten.<br />
And if so this work might have taken quite a long time. On the other hand we know that some marketers have been very successful by using PLR articles in their own version for their websites.<br />
My problem with PLR articles are that they are very boring and often without a clue of anything new.<br />
Some of the circulating PLR articles from the well known &#8216;gurus&#8217; in marketing are really bad, e.g. writing about the darkroom under keywords of digital photography. My feeling is that I have wasted quite a lot of money in buying PLR articels from different suppliers. I admit that some are much better and decent than others.<br />
On the other hand I have to mention the ground breaking approach to successful online presense developed by Ken Evoy. His impressive ebook is now availabe free of charge at <a href="http://contact.sitesell.com/myss/" rel="nofollow">http://contact.sitesell.com/myss/</a> (unbelievable) and there is absolutely no catch. His approach will never ever be dumped by Google, I am sure, as his approach is the real way to develop a long-term business on a shoestring. I go back to this big e-book again and again.<br />
- Have success<br />
Photo Soren (from Denmark)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Penafiel</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-4169</link>
		<author>Paul Penafiel</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-4169</guid>
		<description>Private Label Rights article does gives an individual the rights to re-edit or re-title the content for distribution and republish them under your own name.  I've been using article marketing for several months now using PLR Articles and my page rank have increased from zero to 3.  

But at the same time, you have to change the content to reflect your own writing style and personality, you simply can't cut and paste PLR articles and submit them to article directories under your own name. 

PLR Articles are a godsend for those who are having trouble writing their own articles and with PLR articles, it's already done for you, all you have to do is CHANGE them.

I guess only time will tell, great article though, at least it got my attention.

Paul

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Private Label Rights article does gives an individual the rights to re-edit or re-title the content for distribution and republish them under your own name.  I&#8217;ve been using article marketing for several months now using PLR Articles and my page rank have increased from zero to 3.  </p>
<p>But at the same time, you have to change the content to reflect your own writing style and personality, you simply can&#8217;t cut and paste PLR articles and submit them to article directories under your own name. </p>
<p>PLR Articles are a godsend for those who are having trouble writing their own articles and with PLR articles, it&#8217;s already done for you, all you have to do is CHANGE them.</p>
<p>I guess only time will tell, great article though, at least it got my attention.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damen Choy</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-2170</link>
		<author>Damen Choy</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-2170</guid>
		<description>I don't see any problem in using PLR stuff as long as the user has the patience to edit it to suit their own style of writing. 

And if they use PLR products in non-SEO marketing activity like ebooks, autoresponder, etc, that is also a good way to help their business. In this way, there is no need to worry about duplicate content issues from search engine point of view.

PLR is after all a good idea if the user know how to use it. Of course, lazy marketers who copy and paste PLR stuff and put it on the website hoping to earn easy Adsense dollars are   less likely to succeed because search engines are getting smarter and smarter every day. Duplicate contents can be easily filtered by present content management technology.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any problem in using PLR stuff as long as the user has the patience to edit it to suit their own style of writing. </p>
<p>And if they use PLR products in non-SEO marketing activity like ebooks, autoresponder, etc, that is also a good way to help their business. In this way, there is no need to worry about duplicate content issues from search engine point of view.</p>
<p>PLR is after all a good idea if the user know how to use it. Of course, lazy marketers who copy and paste PLR stuff and put it on the website hoping to earn easy Adsense dollars are   less likely to succeed because search engines are getting smarter and smarter every day. Duplicate contents can be easily filtered by present content management technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-1687</link>
		<author>Jennifer</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 02:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>I think that it is too broad of a statement to simply say that all PLR products are bad. In the hands of the right marketer they can be a goldmine.

They can be used in a variety of ways including newsletters, autoresponder series, special reports and ebooks. All of these are great for building credibility and a strong online brand.

Although I do believe that many people misuse PLR products, I think you're overstating the problem and scaring people away from a source of content that could really help them move their businesses forward.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it is too broad of a statement to simply say that all PLR products are bad. In the hands of the right marketer they can be a goldmine.</p>
<p>They can be used in a variety of ways including newsletters, autoresponder series, special reports and ebooks. All of these are great for building credibility and a strong online brand.</p>
<p>Although I do believe that many people misuse PLR products, I think you&#8217;re overstating the problem and scaring people away from a source of content that could really help them move their businesses forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-1540</link>
		<author>Ron</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>Pryia,

1. Why would I want to re-publish your article on my website. It's duplicate content!!

2. How much more original content is actually on the net anyway unless it is stories about personal experiences or personal interviews. Type anything into Google and you will come up with hundreds if not thousands of sites. Even original content is bound to have sentances if not identical then VERY similar considering the exponential amount of content out there.

I can't see the harm if I read say a biographical article and then rewrite it from memory giving it my slant and voice. Are you telling me Google will determine that this content is duplifcate (along with the other 250,436 other sites that also seem similar)

I don't think you can avoid re-written duplicate material on a large small business website of over 100 pages.

My 2 cents    
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pryia,</p>
<p>1. Why would I want to re-publish your article on my website. It&#8217;s duplicate content!!</p>
<p>2. How much more original content is actually on the net anyway unless it is stories about personal experiences or personal interviews. Type anything into Google and you will come up with hundreds if not thousands of sites. Even original content is bound to have sentances if not identical then VERY similar considering the exponential amount of content out there.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see the harm if I read say a biographical article and then rewrite it from memory giving it my slant and voice. Are you telling me Google will determine that this content is duplifcate (along with the other 250,436 other sites that also seem similar)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you can avoid re-written duplicate material on a large small business website of over 100 pages.</p>
<p>My 2 cents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan ocab</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-344</link>
		<author>alan ocab</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-344</guid>
		<description>Hi Priya,

John Reese, one of the grandfathers of internet marketing, openly said in a forum that "duplicate content" is a myth.

The myth has been capitalized by people selling these "unique content creator" softwares.

The danger however, is the use of PLR articles in tandem with article submission softwares. By using both, you'll get thousands of links pointing to your site in a matter of weeks.That would be link explosion!

Now, when Google sees a sudden spike of your link popularity, you are a candidate for delisting.

Alan
http://www.adsensearticlesystem.com
http://www.grandstart.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Priya,</p>
<p>John Reese, one of the grandfathers of internet marketing, openly said in a forum that &#8220;duplicate content&#8221; is a myth.</p>
<p>The myth has been capitalized by people selling these &#8220;unique content creator&#8221; softwares.</p>
<p>The danger however, is the use of PLR articles in tandem with article submission softwares. By using both, you&#8217;ll get thousands of links pointing to your site in a matter of weeks.That would be link explosion!</p>
<p>Now, when Google sees a sudden spike of your link popularity, you are a candidate for delisting.</p>
<p>Alan<br />
<a href="http://www.adsensearticlesystem.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.adsensearticlesystem.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.grandstart.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.grandstart.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Shah</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-294</link>
		<author>Priya Shah</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Heh, that was a good point. :-) But you're right. These quickie solutions only work until search engines learn to filter them out, and Google seems to be doing a much better job of filtering spam nowadays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, that was a good point. <img src='http://www.marketingslave.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> But you&#8217;re right. These quickie solutions only work until search engines learn to filter them out, and Google seems to be doing a much better job of filtering spam nowadays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wildfire Marketing Group</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-274</link>
		<author>Wildfire Marketing Group</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 05:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marketingslave.com/2006/02/19/three-good-reasons-why-plr-articles-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Personally, I hope they continue using that type of software so that their useless web sites lose their ranking and they are forced to do legitimate work for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I hope they continue using that type of software so that their useless web sites lose their ranking and they are forced to do legitimate work for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
