
Yes, they do, says Jim Edwards in his new article, The Dark Side Of Blogs, posted on his I Gotta Tell You Blog.
In many ways, I consider Jim my mentor. He’s the one responsible for my coming out with my own information product, for which he even wrote the foreword. But as a committed blogger (or blogger who should be committed, depending on your point of view), I disagree with him on the points he makes here. Here’s my take on Jim’s article.
With all the hoopla around blogs, people forget that blogs, by their very nature, represent opinions, and opinions don’t necessarily represent the facts.
Too many people take the written word as Gospel Truth. Its not! Remember that behind those words are people, and people, by nature are opinionated, judgemental and subjective. Use common sense to reach your own conclusions about what you read online… and off.
People can and do post whatever they want because no “hall monitor” can call them down for blatant intellectual hooliganism.
This is true to some extent. But remember that the internet is self-regulated. Calls for curbing the freedom to write what we wish have been roundly condemned, especially by bloggers who view regulation on blogs as a violation of their freedom of expression.
In fact, in some countries where freedom of expression is minimal or non-existent, blogs have provided an outlet for people to reach beyond their country’s borders and share their views with the rest of the world.
And then why single out blogs for being hotbeds of opinion? You can say the same about books, newspapers or any media you come across today.
This diversity of opinion is, in fact what makes the human race so fascinating. Imagine how boring it would be if everyone had the same opinion about everything! Indeed there would be no scientific progress, no new discoveries…
Significant progress in human society is made by people who think (and opine) differently, who don’t follow the herd. Differences in opinion should be appreciated, not condemned.
But make no mistake, every person publishing a blog with any level of readership (not junk blogs used for search engine promotion) takes a stance on the issues, whether political, social, religious or business.
Even if they strive to be impartial and only report the “news,” blog publishers are human beings who want you to think they’re smart, agree with them, and accept their point of view, even if they don’t realize it consciously.
Less scrupulous blog publishers often exploit the social and psychological power of blogs to spread disinformation (intentionally wrong information) to further their agenda. This tactic rates quite popular on political blogs and has started creeping into business blogs too.
Again this applies to any media. Do you think newspaper publishers, TV moghuls and radio producers, don’t have an agenda? Of course, they do! And that agenda is to attract more advertising. Anything that keeps advertisers away is silently censored or never aired at all. It’s all about the money, honey! You’d be naive to think otherwise.
If blog publishers have an agenda (which they clearly do, because that is the purpose of publishing a blog in the first place), at least most of them are upfront and open about it. And bloggers are the first ones to “out” any poser or fake blogs. In that case I believe they’re more well-regulated than mainstream media, don’t you think?
Jim does outline some valid guidelines you should follow when reading blogs. But I would extrapolate this to any other source of information (newspapers, TV, radio, books, seminars) as well.
1. What is my purpose in searching for information on this subject?
2. Is this a credible source of information?
3. What ulterior motive, conscious or otherwise, do they have in publishing this information?
4. What alternative sources of information can I find to confirm / dispute the information on this blog?
The blog publishing phenomenon is already forcing MSM (mainstream media) to take blogs and bloggers seriously. Bloggers have broken stories, covered disasters, been sued and lauded for publishing news that MSM wouldn’t touch.
If you think that blogs are scary, evil things that mislead innocent readers, then be afraid, be very afraid…